On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:26:27AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 4/29/20 10:00 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:40:40AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> On little endian platforms that don't define __arch_swab32p, be32_to_cpu
> >> ultimately expands to an expression that evaluates its argument multiple
> >> times. Because of the increment, this is wrong (and UB because of
> >> unsequenced modification).
> >> Hoist the side effect out of the macro argument.
> >
> > I'm not sure if the reasoning is correct. That would mean that
> > of_read_number() doesn't work on ARM, but I can assure it actually does.
>
> Typo, sorry. arch needs to define __arch_swab32 (no p at the end).
>
> of_read_number -> be32_to_cpu -> __be32_to_cpu -> __swab32 -> __fswab32
>
> then
>
> static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswab32(__u32 val)
> {
> #ifdef __arch_swab32
> return __arch_swab32(val);
> #else
> return ___constant_swab32(val);
> #endif
> }
>
> where ___constant_swab32 is the macro that evaluates the argument
> multiple times.
__fswab32 is a function, for the caller it doesn't matter how often
___constant_swab32 evaluates its argument.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
