On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:40:40AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On little endian platforms that don't define __arch_swab32p, be32_to_cpu
> ultimately expands to an expression that evaluates its argument multiple
> times. Because of the increment, this is wrong (and UB because of
> unsequenced modification).
> Hoist the side effect out of the macro argument.
I'm not sure if the reasoning is correct. That would mean that
of_read_number() doesn't work on ARM, but I can assure it actually does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/of.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/of.h b/include/of.h
> index 85d55f9b57dc..08bbeaf4d21b 100644
> --- a/include/of.h
> +++ b/include/of.h
> @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ struct fdt_header *of_get_fixed_tree(struct device_node *node);
> static inline u64 of_read_number(const __be32 *cell, int size)
> {
> u64 r = 0;
> - while (size--)
> - r = (r << 32) | be32_to_cpu(*(cell++));
> + for (; size--; cell++)
> + r = (r << 32) | be32_to_cpu(*cell);
That said, the implementation looks way better with this patch.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
