On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:26:58AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On 8/19/19 3:38 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > +void dt_2nd_aarch64(void *fdt)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long image_start = (unsigned long)_text + global_variable_offset();
> > +
> > + arm_setup_stack(image_start);
>
> Shouldn't we rather place the stack somewhere beyond the end of the barebox image
> instead of assuming that we can access the memory before the start?
Yes, this should be better. barebox is sometimes loaded directly to the
start of SDRAM.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
