Re: erroneous behavior for iMX+GPT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sascha,

Am Montag, den 14.10.2019, 14:25 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> Hi Leif,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 02:15:39PM +0000, Middelschulte, Leif wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > setting up GPT on an iMX6, I noticed a small bug subject to
> > CONFIG_PARTITION_DISK_EFI_GPT_NO_FORCE that leads to unparsed GPTs.
> > 
> > Background: The iMX supports the mmc user partition as bootmedia
> > source too.
> > 
> > Problem: The (additional) filetype check[0] fails, if the given buffer
> > contains multiple, subsequent file(type)s. The buffer might contain
> > the beginning of a disk that contains i.e. a Barebox image *and* a
> > partition table. The function file_detect_type returns a single (first
> > recognized) type[1]. In my case, it returns the Barebox image type.
> 
> Looks like the file_detect_type() there should be replaced with
> file_detect_partition_table().
> 
> > 
> > There is a comment about this additional check noting it will be
> > mandatory as it will be "[..] added to the EFI Spec. per Intel after
> > v1.02.". Anybody can elaborate on that?
> > That feedback could help to understand why file_detect_partition_table
> > is insufficient in this case.
> 
> What makes you think that file_detect_partition_table() is insufficient?
Nothing makes *me* think it's insufficient. Yet the author explicitly added this *additional* check and did *not* use the suggested alternative function.

That's why I asked. I'm not familiar with the spec. Maybe it is mandates such a treatment?
> 
> Sascha
> 

Leif
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux