Hi Ahmad.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Only at91sam9g45_reset.S and the header itself actually use
> any of the macros defined within.
>
> Instead of adding missing definitions and adapting the incoming DDRAMC
> initialization code from at91bootstrap, just include the at91_ddrsdrc.h
> header wholesale.
This seems to go in the opposite direction
of what we did in for example this commit:
eaa7fcf934826d519f532227c304c09a62cfe685 ("ARM: at91: Add SoC namespace to matrix defines")
It adds a lot of defines that are not prefixed with SOC names,
so asking for conflicts.
Also the patch was a little hard to follow with several types of
changes in one patch.
(Adding files, replacing header files, deleting files)
Sam
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
