On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 12:32:50PM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > Beside, go you agree to upgrade files copyrighted by you as > > GPL-2.0-or-later? > > Not now. We use many codes from linux kernel (mostly GPL-2.0-only). > Can we face the problems of porting linux kernel code to barebox? > > I see strange thing: most barebox files are GPL-2.0-only, > but asm/bitopts.h changed GPL-2.0-only to GPL-2.0-or-later after the commit > > commit 227a20fe31c6a03795a202f95af95fb371951963 > Author: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Jul 16 09:40:30 2014 +0200 > > consistently use the same bitops.h file > > @Sascha Please comment on GPL-2.0-only vs GPL-2.0-or-later in barebox. Barebox has preferred GPL-2.0-only starting from day-1, see toplevel COPYING. As GPL-2.0-or-later is compatible with that, it is ok to include or-later code into an otherwhise-2.0-only codebase. rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
