On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 09:31:24AM +0200, Pascal Vizeli wrote: > 2018-06-08 9:05 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > of_find_property is not called directly from the code you are changing, > > so how excatly is the code path that fails? > > of_get_reproducible_name -> of_get_property -> of_find_property > > > > > What are you doing to get into this situation? This test should never > > fail or else we are in trouble. Is there some "oftree -f" command > > involved? I should really remove this command since in a device tree > > based system there are always references to device nodes which are not > > expected to become invalid. > > > > Yes, I load the device tree from first bootloader and overlay some state dtbo. > But how I should do this without flush? I can do that also an a file > and load this > to bootm, but the fixups will also run on this and fails too. > > I think we need remove `oftree -f` or apply this patch for hardening. Just sent a patch for the former as the latter is a goal we do not seem to reach. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
