2018-06-08 9:05 GMT+02:00 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > of_find_property is not called directly from the code you are changing, > so how excatly is the code path that fails? of_get_reproducible_name -> of_get_property -> of_find_property > > What are you doing to get into this situation? This test should never > fail or else we are in trouble. Is there some "oftree -f" command > involved? I should really remove this command since in a device tree > based system there are always references to device nodes which are not > expected to become invalid. > Yes, I load the device tree from first bootloader and overlay some state dtbo. But how I should do this without flush? I can do that also an a file and load this to bootm, but the fixups will also run on this and fails too. I think we need remove `oftree -f` or apply this patch for hardening. Greets Pascal _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
