Hi Sasha. > I was just thinking, the kernel build system is great for compiling > barebox itself, but for compiling the userspace host and target tools > autotools would be a better match as they much better allow to specify > the necessary compilers and to pull the necessary dependencies in. What specific problems are you trying to solve that is not solved today by the support in scripts/Makefile.host? I notice you want to build tools for the target as well. This should be relatively easy to add support for that using the current kbuild syntax. I we are going for something more standard then cmake or meson are more modern choices than the dreadful autotools stuff. And with modern I also imply better / simpler. > Any opinions or even volunteers? Any specific program you have in mind? Sam _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
