Re: [PATCH 2/2] i.MX6ull evk support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 28.09.2017, 11:26 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 27.09.2017, 14:16 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-
> > > imx/Kconfig
> > > index 92440e3a75..dab19a33ec 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> > > @@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ config ARCH_IMX6UL
> > >  	bool
> > >  	select ARCH_IMX6
> > >  
> > > +config ARCH_IMX6ULL
> > > +	bool
> > > +	select ARCH_IMX6
> > > +
> > 
> > Do we really need this? Seems the MX6ULL is just a stripped down
> > version of the MX6UL.
> 
> We probably do not need this, but I suggest to keep it anyway. I
> think
> it makes it a bit clearer that there are indeed i.MX6ul *and*
> i.MX6ull
> and both are supported.

Yeah, your decision, but I'll notice that we don't have separate
Kconfig symbols for MX6Q/DL, which probably expose more software
visible differences than MX6UL/ULL.

Regards,
Lucas

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux