On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 27.09.2017, 14:16 +0200 schrieb Sascha Hauer: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > index 92440e3a75..dab19a33ec 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > @@ -162,6 +162,10 @@ config ARCH_IMX6UL > > bool > > select ARCH_IMX6 > > > > +config ARCH_IMX6ULL > > + bool > > + select ARCH_IMX6 > > + > Do we really need this? Seems the MX6ULL is just a stripped down > version of the MX6UL. We probably do not need this, but I suggest to keep it anyway. I think it makes it a bit clearer that there are indeed i.MX6ul *and* i.MX6ull and both are supported. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
