> On 4 Jul 2017, at 12:19 AM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all. > > I recently purchased an AT91SAM9263-EK from ebay and > have played around a little with barebox. > For now only some observations. > > I had the impression that I could > drop AT91BootStrap when using barebox. Yes Wrote the support for that but on the 9263 you are limited. you have 2 choice boot a small barebox <= 72kiB or use a console less barebox to boot the second barebox as the rom code on at91 will load the barebox from the SD or Nand into SRAM > > But I could not make it boot until I deployed > at91bootstrap (named BOOT.BIN) on the SD-card. > And I named arch/arm/pbl/zbarebox.bin => u-boot.bin > on the SD-card. > on 9263ek you have a nor flash so why not flash it in this case barebox will boot by itself without the bootstrap Best Regards, J. > I wanted to boot barebox - but nothing happened. > So I tried older versions af barebox: > > v2017.06.0 => Boots OK (did not try to load a kernel) > > v2017.07.0 => Boots but emits: > NULL pointer dereference at address 0x00000014 > ### Please RESET the board ### > (A bit more was written to the serial console) > > master from git => Nothing written to the console at all > > I will as time permits dig deeper into this. > Seems like we are facing two bugs: > One that causes the NULL pointer, and another that > prevents any output. > > As barebox is quick to build and the bug is simple to spot > I will likely just try to bisect and see where I end up. > > Sam > > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
