On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Normally the environment is much smaller, so I wouldn't expect issues > here. The alternative to making the environment smaller would be to move > other partitions to the back. This would probably hurt more, especially > since a regular fdisk starts the first partition at offset 1MiB. > > Another approach would be to use a MBR partition for the environment > instead of using the raw device. > >> >> Shouldn't this change be done by a separate patch? > > We can't increase the barebox partition without shrinking the > environment right behind it. Or do you mean that we first shrink Ok, got it. I wasn't aware of this 1MiB requirement, so all is fine then. Thanks _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
