On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:53:23PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 19:12 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > - if (modstate & (1 << 0)) > > > > > + if (modstate & (1 << 1)) > > > > > + ascii = keycode_bb_ctrl_keys[ev->code]; > > ascii = keycode_bb_keys[ev->code]; > ascii = ascii >= 'a' ? CTL_CH(ascii): 0; > > > > Sasha, did you mean to eliminate the CTRL-keymap completely? > > > > No, I didn't, although that would be an option aswell. It would safe us > > a few more bytes in the binary. The question is, how many more keys are > > in the CTRL map that are interesting for us? Are there more than CTRL-C? > > If yes, then it's probably better to keep the map. If not, a special > > CTRL-C case in code might be the better option. > > Would the above, or a slight modification, be ok? It gets almost all > the controls keys one could care about. Yes, this looks good. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
