On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:33:55AM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > Ramoops may be useful even without oftree support, as kernels > booted without a DT may have other means to reserve the > ramoops memory. > > Fixes: > In function `ramoops_probe': > undefined reference to `of_add_reserve_entry' > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/pstore/ram.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
