Hi Steffen Am Montag, 1. Februar 2016, 14:03:39 schrieb Steffen Trumtrar: (...) > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dts > > > > > b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dts new file mode > > > > > 100644 > > > > > index 000000000000..5d1840451382 > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dts > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ > > > > > +/* > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > + * > > > > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > > > > modify > > > > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > > > > > published by > > > > > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, > > > > > or > > > > > + * (at your option) any later version. > > > > > + * > > > > > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > > > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > > > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > > > > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > > > > > + * > > > > > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public > > > > > License > > > > > + * along with this program. If not, see > > > > > <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > > > > > + */ > > > > > + > > > > > +#include <arm/socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dts> > > > > > > > > This is the wrong DT. > > > > What you AFAIK want is the socfgpa_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts This one is not beeing found. Did you mean socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dts. Which is also not there. I do *think* that the Sockit board has a similar layout. So i deliberately choose this file. Should i copy and adapt this file? > > > > The "Terasic DE0-Nano" is the same as the "Terasic DE-0" or isn't it? > > > > From the website it at least seems like it. > > > > According to the DE0-Nano-SoC_QSG.pdf document: > > "Whats the difference between the DE0-Nano-SoC kit and the Atlas-SoC kit? > > > > The hardware is the same for the DE0-Nano-SoC kit and the Atlas-SoC kit. > > The only difference is the getting-started process for the two kits. Users > > can freely use the DE0-Nano-SoC kit resources on the Atlas-SoC kit and > > vice versa." > > > > > > With the other dts you then should be able to remove > > > > > > > > > +#include "socfpga.dtsi" > > > > > + > > > > > +/ { > > > > > + model = "Terasic DE0-Nano(Atlas)"; > > > > So with that it would be more precise to name it DE0-Nano-SoC (Atlas)? > > It would be than different to that in the linux kernel? > > IIRC Dinh, who did the dts, initially started with an even more confusing > naming and ended with this. > It seems reasonable to me, to fix the model name in linux to match the dts > name, i.e. "DE0-Nano-SoC". I don't know how the "Atlas" fits in there > though. The Atlas part is just plain weird. But if someone is grepping for Atlas support its at least nice to have it in there. Best regards Tim _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
