AFAIK include/linux/barebox-wrapper.h was introduced to simplify Linux driver porting. During my current effort to port SquashFS driver I had to repeatedly remove such includes like: #include <linux/vfs.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/wait.h> and so on. Would it be better to provide such headers even if they would almost always include dummy code? Though it would pollute the include folder somehow, but it will be easier to port/sync Linux drivers and it will help to preserve the structure of this drivers. What do you think about this? Yegor _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
