Hi Yegor, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:03:17AM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > With CONFIG_BOOTM_FORCE_SIGNED_IMAGES the bootm code will refuse to boot > > unsigned images. Since currently FIT is the only image type which > > supports signing this means we with this option we enforce using FIT > > comma is missing after "supports signing", "we" after "means" must go away > > > images. All additionally passed in device trees and initrds will be > > a word is missing between "All" and "additionally" I think not, I reread the sentence and it still makes sense to me. I fixed the other things you mentioned. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
