Hi Jan, On 15 January 2016 at 01:36, Jan Lübbe <jlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Do, 2016-01-14 at 21:03 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 01/14/2016 08:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> > Someone pointed me to this support that is being added in Barebox. I see >> > that it still has the copyright but does not attribute U-Boot. I'm just >> > checking if that is that an oversight? >> >> I've Cc'ed Jan, who has written the code. Quoting from his first patch >> to the barebox mailinglist: >> >> > this is the current work-in-progress state of my FIT support patches. >> > The FIT loading code has basically been rewritten from scratch, as the >> > original U-Boot code uses libfdt and barebox's DT support works on an >> > in-memory tree. > > Yes, this is still correct for the recent submissions. > > The barebox code only supports the signed configurations with hashed > images, as the goal was to use this for verified boot. Supporting only > this mode keeps the complexity down. > > Simon, do you think it is a derived work of the U-Boot FIT code? The verified boot implementation looks like it came from U-Boot. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
