On 01/05/2016 11:28 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > Hi Marc, > > thanks for reposting the patches. > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Jan Luebbe <jlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This implementation is inspired by U-Boot's FIT support. Instead of >> using libfdt (which does not exist in barebox), configuration signatures >> are verified by using a simplified DT parser based on barebox's own >> code. >> >> Currently, only signed configurations with hashed images are supported, >> as the other variants are less useful for verified boot. Compatible FIT >> images can be created using U-Boot's mkimage tool. > > What about unsigned images? That's not our use case. We use plain zImages instead. > I also get: unsupported algo crc32 > Is it intended to be supported? Not for our usecase - feel free to add crc32 support. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
