On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 20:46:02 +0100
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 07:10:58PM +0300, Peter Mamonov wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I've ported an UHCI driver from the u-boot to the barebox (WIP). To
> > interoperate with the EHCI driver, the UHCI driver should be probed
> > ater the EHCI driver. Both drivers are binded via the device tree
> > mechanism. How can i achieve the correct probe order?
>
> Do you have an example binding to look at? Normally I would assume
> that the binding makes sure somehow that the uhci driver has to be
> probed.
At the moment the binding is quite straightforward:
ehci: ehci@1ba00200 {
compatible = "generic-ehci";
reg = <0x00000000 0x20 0x00000000 0x100>;
status = "disabled";
};
uhci: uhci@1ba00000 {
compatible = "generic-uhci";
reg = <0x00000000 0x200>;
status = "disabled";
};
Probably, we can add "companion = <&ehci>;" into the uhci node and
check if the ehci has been probed by calling of_find_device_by_node(),
as Alexander Aring proposed.
>
> Sascha
>
>
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
