On 13.10.2015 10:00, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 08:51:54PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 12.10.2015 09:36, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
I used
memcpy -s /mnt/image.img -d /dev/nand0.u-boot.bb 0 0
i.e. I did not specify any rwsize option. Looking at the code,
mem_parse_options does initialize mode with 0 and memcpy_sz
should use plain memcpy as fallback.
However, if I look at include/fcntl.h, I see that O_RWSIZE_8
collides with O_CREAT. I think that is the root cause of the
64b memcpy_sz issue I am suffering from?
Oh Damned! /me hiding under a brown paper bag.
I don't know how you are calling memcpy_sz, but that could lead to
these kind problems.
memcpy_sz is called by fs/fs.c when using memcpy command above.
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
