On Fr, 2015-04-10 at 10:18 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > However, I do agree that balancing the calls makes sense as long as we > cannot guarantee that receive buffers are treated read-only and > transmit buffers write-only. > > So, the NACK is correct, please drop this patch. Lucas, do we need some barebox-specific documentation on how to use the DMA API in network drivers (because RX buffers are not always read-only)? It seems several people got confused the same way. Regards, Jan -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
