On 08:17 Thu 12 Mar , Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:53:08PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > the hmac algo will be registered as hmac(%s) such as hmac(sha256)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > +static int digest_hmac_alloc(struct digest *d)
> > +{
> > + struct digest_hmac_ctx *dh = d->ctx;
> > + struct digest_hmac *hmac = to_digest_hmac(d->algo);
> > +
> > + dh->d = digest_alloc(hmac->name);
> > + if (!dh->d)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + dh->ipad = xmalloc(sizeof(unsigned char) * hmac->pad_length);
> > + dh->opad = xmalloc(sizeof(unsigned char) * hmac->pad_length);
>
> sizeof(unsigned char) is 1. Dropped while applying.
habit to always use sizeof but yes no diff
Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
