Dear Antony, I applaud that you're working on incorporating picoTCP into barebox - I work for the company that developed picoTCP, and so I am naturally enthusiastic about this. However, one small thing that should be taken into account, concerning licensing. According to the wiki, barebox is licensed under "gplv2 or later", while picoTCP is licensed only under gplv2. I Am Not A Lawyer, but I think this means that, if your work would at some point make it into the master branch of barebox, the licensing notes may need to be changed to something like "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version (except for the picoTCP part, which is version 2 only)." Another option would be for barebox to drop the "or later"-part... although some people here may feel strongly about keeping it in. (Let's just hope I didn't ignite a gplv2/v3 flame war by suggesting this!) Maybe there are other options - what are your thoughts on this issue? Keep up the good work! Best Regards, Frederik Van Slycken _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
