On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:57:18PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Sascha, > > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> --- a/drivers/serial/serial_imx.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/serial/serial_imx.c > >>> @@ -258,7 +258,8 @@ static int imx_serial_getc(struct console_device *cdev) > >>> while (readl(priv->regs + priv->devtype->uts) & UTS_RXEMPTY); > >>> > >>> ch = readl(priv->regs + URXD0); > >>> - > >>> + if (ch >= 0x80) > >>> + ch = '?'; > >> > >> This is not part of the fix, right? > > > > Correct, this is not part of the fix. > > > > This code is just to help reproducing the issue in console, without > > the need of hooking an oscilloscope to the UART pins or inspecting > > directly the UART TX registers. > > Any comments, Sascha? No, I assumed you resend the patch without the hunk above. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
