On Apr 6, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Michel Stam <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Antony, > > Interesting idea- I wonder if its difficult given that U-boot is already supported? > > Personally I have no experience with coreboot, the systems I test on are industrial x86 SBCs with their own BIOS. I suppose it is oossible, maybe we can borrow code from u-boot. > Should be fairly easy > Another thing along the sane lines that crossed my mind is EFI support for barebox, I wonder if theres interest in that? EFI yes as ARM will use UEFI too > > Next on my list is keyboard/VGA, maybe VESA support if I have the time. I would like to see a console, possibly a framebuffer driver. No idea how difficult that will be. > good idea > Cheers, > > Michel Stam > > >> On 5 apr. 2014, at 21:00, Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements. >> >> IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox promotion. >> >> Please see http://www.coreboot.org/Payloads >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Antony Pavlov > _______________________________________________ > barebox mailing list > barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
