Re: RFC: barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Antony,

Interesting idea- I wonder if its difficult given that U-boot is already supported?

Personally I have no experience with coreboot, the systems I test on are industrial x86 SBCs with their own BIOS. I suppose it is oossible, maybe we can borrow code from u-boot.

Another thing along the sane lines that crossed my mind is EFI support for barebox, I wonder if theres interest in that?

Next on my list is keyboard/VGA, maybe VESA support if I have the time. I would like to see a console, possibly a framebuffer driver. No idea how difficult that will be.

Cheers,

Michel Stam


> On 5 apr. 2014, at 21:00, Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements.
> 
> IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox promotion.
> 
> Please see http://www.coreboot.org/Payloads
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>   Antony Pavlov

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux