Re: bug in arm_cpu_lowlevel_init ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> The lr (r14) register has different instances, one for each mode. It
> could be that once we switch to a different mode in arm_cpu_lowlevel_init
> we see another instance of r14. So to me the patch looks correct, we
> shouldn't rely on lr as return address but rather use another register
> for storing the address.
> The above only happens though when the CPU is not in SVC32 mode already.
> What first stage loader are you using? Could you analyze in which mode
> the CPU is when the loader jumps to barebox?
>
The first stage loader was written by myself longlong ago. So forgot the
details.  I just look the code closer, Found the flowwing line just
before jumps to barebox.

  asm ("msr CPSR_c, %0" : :"i"(ARM_MODE_SYS|I_BIT|F_BIT));

So it seems the cpu is in system mode when run barebox.
Your explanation is right.

-- 
Best Regards,
zzs



_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux