* Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote (on 2014-01-09 21:36:41 +0530): adding list, missed it. > * Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote (on 2014-01-09 08:29:14 +0100): > > > On 15:07 Wed 08 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Hi Santosh, > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:15:39AM +0530, Santosh Sivaraj wrote: > > > > Theoritically there is no limit for the partitions that can be created > > > > based on EFI/GPT, so make the number of partitions that can be visible > > > > in barebox a configurable option. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > common/partitions/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > > > > common/partitions/parser.h | 2 +- > > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/common/partitions/Kconfig b/common/partitions/Kconfig > > > > index 90238ad..f3353dd 100644 > > > > --- a/common/partitions/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/common/partitions/Kconfig > > > > @@ -31,3 +31,8 @@ config PARTITION_DISK_EFI_GPT_COMPARE > > > > depends on PARTITION_DISK_EFI > > > > default y > > > > bool "EFI: GPT: compare primary and Alternate GPT header for validity" > > > > + > > > > +config MAX_PARTITIONS > > > > + depends on PARTITION_DISK_EFI > > > > + int "Maximum of partitions needed to be supported on a GPT" > > > > + default 8 > > > > > > Can we instead allocate the partitions dynamically? This limitation to > > > eight partitions we currently have is not nice, but making it > > > configurable is not a proper fix. > > > > agreed but a limit will be good too > > > > Best Regards, > > J. > > > > > > Sascha > > > > > We could keep a configurable maximum, with a high default, but do the allocation > dynamically. I will try to send in a patch, we can discuss how it needs to be > done over it. > > Thanks, > Santosh -- _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
