Am Montag, den 06.01.2014, 10:32 +0100 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 02:24:48PM +0100, Jan Weitzel wrote:
> > Let of_find_node_by_path_or_alias also find a node starting with an alias
> > followed by a path like "i2c0/tps@24"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Weitzel <j.weitzel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2: rename ret to node
> >
> > drivers/of/base.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> > index ea2d879..5b5272d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> > @@ -1378,11 +1378,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_by_path);
> > struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path_or_alias(struct device_node *root,
> > const char *str)
> > {
> > + struct device_node *node;
> > + char *slash, *alias;
> > + size_t len = 0;
> > +
> > if (*str == '/')
> > return of_find_node_by_path_from(root, str);
> > - else
> > +
> > + slash = _strchr(str, '/');
>
> You should use regular strchr, not _strchr. Or is there any reason to do
> it differently here?
I got this from the strchr wrapper:
drivers/of/base.c: In function 'of_find_node_by_path_or_alias':
drivers/of/base.c:1388:8: warning: assignment discards 'const' qualifier
from pointer target type [enabled by default]
Is there a cleaner way?
Jan
>
> Sascha
>
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
