Hi Steffen, now I figoure out that this is a bigger problem. There are architecture which not use the COMMON_CLK framework and has it own clock framework implementation (for me it was ARCH_AT91). Then the build failed. So now we could make a depends on !ARCH_AT91 in COMMON_CLK and a depends on COMMON_CLK in DRIVER_SERIAL_CADENCE... but this is very ugly and maybe the ARCH_AT91 get a COMMON_CLK framework... Sorry for the noise. - Alex _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
