On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 16:39 Thu 05 Dec , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:48:35AM +0100, Alexander Aring wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I need a new challenge in my free time. :-) > > > > > > So maybe I could try to implement a ipv6 stack for barebox. Are there > > > some interest to apply a ipv6 stack into barebox? > > > > > > I don't need to begin any work if there are no interest to add a ipv6 > > > support. > > > > > > ... and yes I know that's maybe a really big project, but I like to get > > > some new experience. > > > > Sooner or later I think we will need ipv6 support, but now I think it's > > up to you if you have enough interest in it to implement it ;) > > I've evaluate it and I does not want to support a custom implementation > > I was thinking simply integration uIP stack so we can have ip/tcp v4/v6 stack > mhh, yea I know the uIP stack from contiki os. I really don't like contiki code. :-) But we can try to use the uIP as basis, of course. Then we could have a basically ipv6 support. - Alex _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
