On 22:17 Wed 10 Jul , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:50:28PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > It's the same binding, yes. > > > > > > > > I do not like to duplicate the information can de avoid this > > > > > > Which information? The Documentation? > > > > no the fact we need to describe the nor-partitions twice, for barebox and for > > linux in the DTB > > No, barebox should copy (or move) the partition nodes to where Linux > finds them before starting the kernel. This is not yet implemented > though. > > Another option of course is to do the obvious and put the partitions > under the mtd device in the first place. I decided against this since > I have the strong feeling that the hardware description should be > separated from clearly board (or project or usecase) specific partition > descriptions. here we need to be more generic as it's booloader specific not really barebox > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
