On 06/27/13 20:19, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:00:46AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 06/27/13 10:58, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:50:10AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 06/27/13 08:51, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Applied this series with the change that I removed the dead code
ifdeffed with CONFIG_PPC_DCR.
Ok, great! Next patch sets will be focused on actually using the
DT improvements. I have an SPI driver for MACH_MVEBU ready and
running, and I am working on importing generic SDHCI from Linux.
The sdhc driver in Linux is a big piece of shit which uses the wrong
abstraction model. This is shown by the fact that 32bits are not enough
to abstract the quirks. Even with all these quirks the i.MX part of this
driver has to implement driver logic in the register access functions.
That just insane. I'm not really looking forward to add this driver
to barebox.
Ok, fair enough. Then I'll be adding the required callbacks to Dove
SDHCI driver directly based on current barebox i.MX driver.
I think for the SDHC a library approach would be good: Add a new driver
and share common code/helper functions. I recently factored out the
register defines as a start so that these can be shared.
Yeah, I just working at SDHCI driver for Dove and wonder if I start
to wrap my brain around readl/writel or go with readb/w/l as it is
supposed to be.
As soon as I got some valid responses back from the usdcard, I have
another look at sdhci.h and a generic approach.
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
