On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:29:58PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > This imports of_get_parent, of_get_next_child, of_get_next_available_child, > and of_get_child_by_name and corresponding helpers from Linux OF API. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Cc: barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/of/base.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/of.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c > index 148f832..17364ea 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/base.c > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c > @@ -862,6 +862,84 @@ int of_device_is_available(const struct device_node *device) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_device_is_available); > > +/** > + * of_get_parent - Get a node's parent if any > + * @node: Node to get parent > + * > + * Returns a pointer to the parent node or NULL if already at root. > + */ > +struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node *node) > +{ > + if (!node) > + return NULL; > + > + return (node == root_node) ? NULL : node->parent; parent should be NULL for the root_node, so it should be safe to remove this additional check. This is also in the sense of making multiple devicetrees possible. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox