Hello, My wish is to use POSIX/ISO-C-hosted way in commands/ and lib/ They are similar to user-land in Unix. But I'm not sure if it's better replacing all malloc.h to stdlib.h. common/, fs/ and some places are equivalent to kernel inside. There are not always required to confirm to POSIX/ISO-C-hosted. 2013/6/3 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Masaki Muranaka wrote: >> Some functions should be defined in stdlib.h or unistd.h. >> --- >> include/malloc.h | 8 +++----- >> include/malloc_isoc.h | 11 +++++++++++ >> include/malloc_posix.h | 8 ++++++++ >> include/stdlib.h | 1 + >> include/unistd.h | 6 ++++++ >> 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 include/malloc_isoc.h >> create mode 100644 include/malloc_posix.h >> create mode 100644 include/unistd.h >> >> diff --git a/include/malloc.h b/include/malloc.h >> index 7b9b062..9554597 100644 >> --- a/include/malloc.h >> +++ b/include/malloc.h >> @@ -5,20 +5,18 @@ >> >> /* Public routines */ >> >> -void* malloc(size_t); >> -void free(void*); >> -void* realloc(void*, size_t); >> +#include <malloc_isoc.h> >> +#include <malloc_posix.h> >> + >> void* memalign(size_t, size_t); >> void* vallocc(size_t); >> void* pvalloc(size_t); >> -void* calloc(size_t, size_t); >> void cfree(void*); >> int malloc_trim(size_t); >> size_t malloc_usable_size(void*); >> void malloc_stats(void); >> int mallopt(int, int); >> struct mallinfo mallinfo(void); >> -void *sbrk(ptrdiff_t increment); > > Wouldn't it be nicer to move the prototypes to unistd.h / stdlib.h > instead of adding new files? > > Sascha > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- -- Masaki Muranaka Monami-ya LLC, Japan. _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
