Sascha Hauer wrote:
> When printing the cards information the actual clock is much
> more interesting than what the card could support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mci/mci-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> index 416168f..283df2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mci/mci-core.c
> @@ -1395,7 +1395,7 @@ static void mci_info(struct device_d *dev)
> mci->cid[2], mci->cid[3]);
> printf(" CSD: %08X-%08X-%08X-%08X\n", mci->csd[0], mci->csd[1],
> mci->csd[2], mci->csd[3]);
> - printf(" Max. transfer speed: %u Hz\n", mci->tran_speed);
> + printf(" clock: %u Hz\n", mci->host->clock);
> printf(" Manufacturer ID: %02X\n", extract_mid(mci));
> printf(" OEM/Application ID: %04X\n", extract_oid(mci));
> printf(" Product name: '%c%c%c%c%c'\n", mci->cid[0] & 0xff,
But here you ask for the card itself. If you want to know the currently *used*
transfer speed you must ask the interface.
Please keep this information available, as it helps others to get some
information about the used card and might help to debug.
jbe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Juergen Beisert |
Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
