Sebastian,
> +static int armada_370_xp_init_soc(void)
> {
> unsigned long phys_base, phys_size;
>
> - mvebu_init_clocks();
> + armada_370_xp_init_clocks();
> add_generic_device("mvebu-timer", DEVICE_ID_SINGLE, NULL,
> - MVEBU_TIMER_BASE, 0x30, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - NULL);
> - mvebu_memory_find(&phys_base, &phys_size);
> + (unsigned int)ARMADA_370_XP_TIMER_BASE, 0x30,
> + IORESOURCE_MEM, NULL);
> + armada_370_xp_memory_find(&phys_base, &phys_size);
> arm_add_mem_device("ram0", phys_base, phys_size);
> + armada_370_xp_add_uart();
How do you want to support a board which uses another UART instead of
uart0 when you call this from SoC code?
I don't think this line should be here.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
