Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> So you can drop this stack push by using r12 instead of r10. That's fine >> I think, but should be a patch of its own. Can you resend this as two >> patches? > > Oh, I just saw you can't since then r12 would be corrupted when > v7_mmu_cache_flush is called from v7_mmu_cache_off. > > Applied this one to master and the rest to -next with a small > modification. ok; I was about to split patches by renaming 'r10' to 'r12' in the first step (which will work afais because r12 will be pushed on stack on top of v7_mmu_cache_flush()) but was interrupted by other work. Enrico _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
