On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:39:24AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Sascha Hauer, > > On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:19:07 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > As suggested by Antony Pavlov, get rid of the useless clkdev.h in > > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Folded this into the original patch adding it. > > Just a development process question: since you're folding it, it means > that you're rebasing the 'next' branch constantly? > > This sounds off for a public branch on top of which people might be > basing some more work, no? You should normally be able to work on the master branch. If you have dependencies to -next then yes, you would have to rebase which means some work for you. Not having a fast forward branch means that we have a better commit history and that bugs noticed early enough do not even make it to the master branch which increases bisectability significantly. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
