On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 08:34:10PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> The MIPS architecture has different view on memory
> resources than the ARM architecture.
> This patch move memory segment registration
> to a arch-specific files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/dtb.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/mips/boot/dtb.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/of/base.c | 8 +-------
> include/of.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/dtb.c b/arch/arm/cpu/dtb.c
> index 10b73bd..66346cf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/dtb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/dtb.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,19 @@
> #include <common.h>
> #include <init.h>
> #include <of.h>
> +#include <memory.h>
> +
> +void of_add_memory_bank(struct device_node *node, bool dump, int r,
> + u64 base, u64 size)
> +{
> + static char str[6];
> +
> + sprintf(str, "ram%d", r);
> + barebox_add_memory_bank(str, base, size);
> +
> + if (dump)
> + pr_info("%s: %s: 0x%llx@0x%llx\n", node->name, str, size, base);
> +}
Would be good to have this as generic version and call it from arm
specific code. What about powerpc? Does it compile with this patch?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
