Hello, U-Boot doesn't honor the load address of uInitrd images but just places it somewhere in RAM. So it's sensible to let barebox not being more strict than U-Boot. This makes it possible to boot a Debian system on an i.MX53 Loco board with the setup prepared by flash-kernel. That uInitrd uses a load address of 0x0 where there is nothing on i.MX53. This series contains an additional cleanup. I'm not 100% sure it's ok though. Is it intended that UIMAGE_SOME_ADDRESS being passed to bootm not being used literally? Should I squash the cleanup in the other commit? Also a similar simplification might be possible for the load address of the uImage. Sascha Hauer (1): Don't honor initrd load address Uwe Kleine-König (1): bootm: Simplify initrd address handling commands/bootm.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 1.8.2.rc2 _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
