> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:50:26PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > > > I think about dtb-file in /env, but not sure... Thanks. > > > > > > It can be done as well I guess, but that doesn't sound that familiar > > > from what I've seen in the other barebox boards. > > > > Kernel no contain any board for mach-sunxi. > > This mean than all stuff is described via DT. > > In the barebox we should have "mach" & "board", so I think we > > should create empty (fake) board for architectures like this. > > Any other opinions? > > Where would you put the SDRAM setup then? I do not know yet :) Development at planning stage. There are many questions that I am trying to solve. It seems that in order to start, I make a fixed load initially, and then I will try to use the options from DT. > I think it shouldn't be a problem to change barebox to compile > without a board directory if you really don't need one, but I assume > some board specific code will be left. --- _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
