Hi, Le 12/03/2013 18:50, Alexander Shiyan a écrit : >> Le 10/03/2013 15:13, Alexander Shiyan a écrit : >> It can be done as well I guess, but that doesn't sound that familiar >> from what I've seen in the other barebox boards. > > Kernel no contain any board for mach-sunxi. > This mean than all stuff is described via DT. > In the barebox we should have "mach" & "board", so I think we > should create empty (fake) board for architectures like this. Yes, thanks, I'm pretty familiar with the kernel code for mach-sunxi... Barebox is not the kernel. And there's already a number of other architectures that are supported in barebox that boot a kernel that supports only the device tree, like Jean-Christophe said, such as imx, mxs, highbank, at91, etc... So, really, there's nothing fancy about supporting an architecture which *kernel* requires device tree. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
