> Hi Alexander, > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 06:13:43PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Hello All. > > > > I want to add new arch into barebox. n the kernel this arch is dt-only. > > I talking about mach-sunxi. So, how we should handle such platform > > in the barebox? We need always provide dtb to the kernel, then where > > it should be in barebox? > > You asked me privatly whether we should put dtc and friends into The previous question was about the architecture that can be loaded without dtb. Now a little another. :) > barebox, by that time I answered it needs some more time. Maybe this > time has come now. I currently have a branch in the making to add dtc > support and also integration into barebox. > > With this we are able to compile a dts(p) and link the binary into > barebox, so... > > > I think about dtb-file in /env, but not sure... > > ...you could provide a dtb in the binary *) > > Furthermore you could probe barebox itself from the devicetree. > > I'm still not sure whether we should add fullblown devicetrees into > barebox or stripped down versions with only the devices barebox needs. > I think time will tell. > > Give me some hours time, I think then I can post a first version of the > patches. OK. Np. I just want to tell that we already have dt-only archs. > > *) This of course shouldn't mean it can't be overwritten with another > dtb during runtime. Or provide dts in /env and compile it in runtime. --- _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
