... > > > > > > This patch adds generic memory-mapped GPIO controller support. > > > > > > Code taken from Linux Kernel and adopted for barebox. > > > > > > > > > > I'm fine with this if you add a user for it. I wonder though if it's > > > > > worth it to have this driver for barebox. If I have a driver in the > > > > > kernel that already uses it, then this makes it simple to copy it, but > > > > > should I have to write a new gpio driver, I'm unsure if it's simpler > > > > > to write a new gpio driver or to register with the generic gpio > > > > > driver. > > > > > > > > Here's an example that I'm checking: > > > > > > Ok, this indeed looks nice and short. You convinced me ;) > > > > > > As said, I'm fine with the generic gpio driver if you add the below as > > > first user. > > > > I still beg to consider patch for generic GPIO separately. > > Then I will send you two completely different versions of the implementation > > GPIO for CLPS711X for consideration. > > I don't know if I'm misunderstanding you. Of course the generic GPIO > driver and the CLPS711x driver should be two separate patches, but > both should come in the same series. I just want to wait applying the > generic driver until we have a user (and thus compile coverage). No, no, no. I say that I have two different implementations of gpio-clps711x, both is based on generic-gpio but I cannot choose between these :) --- _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
