ping
On 5 February 2013 15:02, Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5 February 2013 14:19, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 10:29 Tue 05 Feb , Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:10:18AM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
>>> > On 4 February 2013 12:37, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:22:39AM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
>>> > >> On 4 February 2013 01:13, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
>>> > >> <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > >> > On 23:16 Sun 03 Feb , Antony Pavlov wrote:
>>> > >> >> Also import related functions gpio_request_one() and
>>> > >> >> gpio_free_array().
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> > >> >> ---
>>> > >> >> drivers/gpio/gpio.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> > >> >> include/gpio.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> > >> >> 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio.c
>>> > >> >> index d37f5a0..631168d 100644
>>> > >> >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio.c
>>> > >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio.c
>>> > >> >> @@ -65,6 +65,72 @@ void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
>>> > >> >> free(gi->label);
>>> > >> >> }
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> +/**
>>> > >> >> + * gpio_request_one - request a single GPIO with initial configuration
>>> > >> >> + * @gpio: the GPIO number
>>> > >> >> + * @flags: GPIO configuration as specified by GPIOF_*
>>> > >> >> + * @label: a literal description string of this GPIO
>>> > >> >> + */
>>> > >> >> +int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio, unsigned long flags, const char *label)
>>> > >> >> +{
>>> > >> >> + int err;
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> + err = gpio_request(gpio, label);
>>> > >> >> + if (err)
>>> > >> >> + return err;
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> + if (flags & GPIOF_DIR_IN)
>>> > >> >> + err = gpio_direction_input(gpio);
>>> > >> >> + else
>>> > >> >> + err = gpio_direction_output(gpio,
>>> > >> >> + (flags & GPIOF_INIT_HIGH) ? 1 : 0);
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> + if (err)
>>> > >> >> + goto free_gpio;
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> + return 0;
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +free_gpio:
>>> > >> >> + gpio_free(gpio);
>>> > >> >> + return err;
>>> > >> >> +}
>>> > >> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_request_one);
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +/**
>>> > >> >> + * gpio_request_array - request multiple GPIOs in a single call
>>> > >> >> + * @array: array of the 'struct gpio'
>>> > >> >> + * @num: how many GPIOs in the array
>>> > >> >> + */
>>> > >> >> +int gpio_request_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
>>> > >> >> +{
>>> > >> >> + int i, err;
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++, array++) {
>>> > >> >> + err = gpio_request_one(array->gpio, array->flags, array->label);
>>> > >> >> + if (err)
>>> > >> >> + goto err_free;
>>> > >> >> + }
>>> > >> >> + return 0;
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +err_free:
>>> > >> >> + while (i--)
>>> > >> >> + gpio_free((--array)->gpio);
>>> > >> >> + return err;
>>> > >> >> +}
>>> > >> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_request_array);
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +/**
>>> > >> >> + * gpio_free_array - release multiple GPIOs in a single call
>>> > >> >> + * @array: array of the 'struct gpio'
>>> > >> >> + * @num: how many GPIOs in the array
>>> > >> >> + */
>>> > >> >> +void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
>>> > >> >> +{
>>> > >> >> + while (num--)
>>> > >> >> + gpio_free((array++)->gpio);
>>> > >> >> +}
>>> > >> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_free_array);
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
>>> > >> >> {
>>> > >> >> struct gpio_info *gi = &gpio_desc[gpio];
>>> > >> >> diff --git a/include/gpio.h b/include/gpio.h
>>> > >> >> index eedb980..37c151d 100644
>>> > >> >> --- a/include/gpio.h
>>> > >> >> +++ b/include/gpio.h
>>> > >> >> @@ -3,6 +3,29 @@
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> #include <asm/gpio.h>
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> +/* make these flag values available regardless of GPIO kconfig options */
>>> > >> >> +#define GPIOF_DIR_OUT (0 << 0)
>>> > >> >> +#define GPIOF_DIR_IN (1 << 0)
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +#define GPIOF_INIT_LOW (0 << 1)
>>> > >> >> +#define GPIOF_INIT_HIGH (1 << 1)
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +#define GPIOF_IN (GPIOF_DIR_IN)
>>> > >> >> +#define GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW (GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_LOW)
>>> > >> >> +#define GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH (GPIOF_DIR_OUT | GPIOF_INIT_HIGH)
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +/**
>>> > >> >> + * struct gpio - a structure describing a GPIO with configuration
>>> > >> >> + * @gpio: the GPIO number
>>> > >> >> + * @flags: GPIO configuration as specified by GPIOF_*
>>> > >> >> + * @label: a literal description string of this GPIO
>>> > >> >> + */
>>> > >> >> +struct gpio {
>>> > >> >> + unsigned gpio;
>>> > >> >> + unsigned long flags;
>>> > >> >> + const char *label;
>>> > >> >> +};
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> #ifndef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
>>> > >> >> static inline int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
>>> > >> >> {
>>> > >> >> @@ -12,9 +35,29 @@ static inline int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
>>> > >> >> static inline void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
>>> > >> >> {
>>> > >> >> }
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +static inline int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio,
>>> > >> >> + unsigned long flags, const char *label)
>>> > >> >> +{
>>> > >> >> + return 0;
>>> > >> >> +}
>>> > >> >> +
>>> > >> >> +static inline int gpio_request_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
>>> > >> >> +{
>>> > >> >> + return 0;
>>> > >> >> +}
>>> > >> > you can not do this
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > as if we start to use this in generic driver where gpio_direction_input/output
>>> > >> > work
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > we will endup with no configuration
>>> > >>
>>> > >> But now in include/gpio.h we have this:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> static inline int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
>>> > >> {
>>> > >> return 0;
>>> > >> }
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Can you explain the difference?
>>> > >
>>> > > gpio_request is not implemented without gpiolib, still you have to
>>> > > configure the direction and value.
>>> >
>>> > Can we use this functions only if gpiolib is enabled?
>>> > Can we skip the function's definiton in the non-gpio situation?
>>>
>>> Sounds fine. We should get rid of the !gpiolib drivers anyway, maybe
>>> this adds some motivation.
>>
>> until every driver are swith to gpiolib NACK as if we switch any generic
>> driver to this as leds, gpio-keys, i2c-gpio etc... we break board support
>> siliently
>
> but leds, gpio-keys, i2c-gpio etc don't use
> gpio_request_one()-related functions.
> If we ristrict the usage of gpio_request_one()-related functions (use
> it only in board code for gpiolib-enabled machines)
> we can avoid mentioned problems.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Antony Pavlov
--
Best regards,
Antony Pavlov
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
