On Sat, 1 Dec 2012, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > a bit embarrassed but, all of a sudden, what used to work just fine > in terms of building and booting barebox on my beagleboard xM (rev C) > doesn't work anymore. > > not that long ago, i documented how easy this was here: > > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/BeagleBoard-xM#Barebox_for_the_xM > > absolutely nothing out of the ordinary as i remember it. so, when > this worked, the boot looked like what you see here: > > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/BeagleBoard-xM#Booting_to_Barebox_on_your_xM_--_it_actually_works > > now, the boot process produces: > > barebox 2012.11.0-00305-g159109f #1 Sat Dec 1 15:51:00 EST 2012 > > > Board: Texas Instrument's Beagle > NAND type unknown: ff,ff > No NAND device found (-19)! > gpmc_nand gpmc_nand0: probe failed: error 6 > omap-hsmmc omap-hsmmc0: registered as omap-hsmmc0 > mci mci0: registered disk0 > malloc space: 0x87bfff10 -> 0x87ffff0f (size 4 MB) > stack space: 0x4020f000 -> 0x4020fc00 (size 3 kB) > booting from MMC1 > > ... and hangs, suggesting that the MLO file is fine, but it's > barebox.bin that simply fails. > > am i missing something painfully obvious? for completeness (and what i of course should have done earlier if i hadn't been drinking chardonnay all afternoon) was test with an earlier version of barebox. so i checked out tag v2012.10.0, and i'm back to a booting version of barebox on my xM, represented by what you see here: http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/BeagleBoard-xM#Booting_to_Barebox_on_your_xM_--_it_actually_works will investigate further ... rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ barebox mailing list barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
