Re: [PATCH 0/2] Y-Modem implementation change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> So before doing the real review, could I ask of you :
>>  - Antony: could you redo your test over a serial line by applying only
>>            the first patch so that you can compare loady and loady2 ?
>>            Don't use "loady2 -g", as Y-Modem/G protocol requires a
>>            lossless line (USB), and a serial line cannot guarantee it.
>
> I have redone the test.
>
> Sorry, but the new 'loady2' does not work. I tested it over 9600 and
> over 115200 serial line.
Oh that's very disappointing.
I have tested that on a serial line, and it does work in my case ...

Could you provide me the "sb" command line you use (or rather your minicom or
other tool) uses please ?

And by private mail, I'd like the output of :
while true; do strace -T -tt -f -xx -s 4096 -o /tmp/forRobert.txt -p $(pidof sb); done

Cheers.

-- 
Robert

_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Embedded]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux